● Strategy ·17 MIN READ ·PUBLISHED APR 7, 2026

Inside a Multi-City Tech Campaign

One message, two coasts, different tempos. How BSM routed 35 walls across San Diego and Honolulu to hit engineering talent in tech-dense markets.

Sézane fashion brand wheatpaste campaign on scaffolding in Tribeca, New York City by Beyond Street Media
Sézane · New York City
BSM install · Strategy

Thirty-five walls. Two coasts. One message. The creative was locked, “Every Generation Faces Its Test. This Is Yours.”, but the execution logic differed completely. San Diego earned a 48-hour blitz across four neighborhoods. Honolulu earned a 72-hour density burn across two downtown clusters. Same Palantir. Same call to action. Different operational tempo calibrated to city size, talent density, and tropical humidity.

This is the behind-the-scenes breakdown of how a B2B recruitment campaign thinks about geography, frequency, and conversion proof.

The Brief: Palantir’s Recruiting Challenge

Palantir Technologies runs recruitment campaigns in markets where top-tier engineering, bioinformatics, and defense-adjacent talent concentrates. The company isn’t trying to recruit everyone, they’re trying to reach senior-level specialists with specific skill sets in specific geographies.

San Diego is one of the few U.S. metros with significant bioinformatics and defense-adjacent engineering talent outside the Valley and DC. UC San Diego biology programs feed the biotech corridor. Torrey Pines is a major pharma and biotech hub. Palantir has an engineering office in the market and wants visibility with local talent considering moves to other firms. The goal: become locally visible in the talent-concentrated corridor where professionals already know the company name but haven’t seriously considered joining.

Honolulu is smaller and more isolated. Tech talent is concentrated (fewer than 15,000 engineers across the island). Palantir has emerging presence but limited local visibility. The goal: signal that the company is thinking about Hawaii specifically, not just recruiting through LinkedIn from the mainland. A street presence in downtown Honolulu tells a specific story to the talent pool already there: “we’re investing in this market, not just hunting you remotely.”

The ask from Palantir was straightforward: place the poster in high-dwell commercial zones, hit neighborhood-scale saturation, document every wall with GPS-tagged proof, and no phased rollouts.

City Selection Logic: Why These Two Markets

Recruiting strategy normally looks like this: place ads in California and Washington State where the talent density is highest, optimize for reach, and call it done.

Palantir’s strategy was different: place ads in secondary tech markets where high-value talent concentrates, spend budget on frequency in those specific zones, and rely on geographic specificity to cut through noise.

The logic:

San Diego. UC San Diego and Torrey Pines biotech corridor = concentrated talent. Bioinformatics and drug-discovery engineering are specialized. Every engineer in the corridor knows the other engineers. A visible street campaign signals market seriousness and generates internal conversation (Slack posts, recruiter mentions, employee questions). Recruiting campaign in SF or Seattle reaches 1M engineers of mixed quality; recruiting campaign in San Diego reaches 500 high-value specialists at concentrated intensity. Same marketing dollar, different ROI by specialization.

Honolulu. Smaller talent pool (~15K engineers across Oahu). Most have considered leaving the island for mainland opportunity. Palantir’s presence in Hawaii is real but undersized. A street campaign on Ala Moana and downtown says “we’re not just hunting you remotely; we’re investing in your market.” That signal carries weight in smaller markets because it’s novel. A visibility presence in a market as small as Honolulu registers as serious commitment, not random digital noise.

Geographic specificity is the entire thesis: concentrate budget and frequency in markets where the target talent already clusters and where outsiders (competitors) are thin on the ground.

Surface Strategy: Why Brick, Why Scaffolding, Why Gaslamp

Surfaces matter less for what they are than for where they sit relative to talent commute patterns.

San Diego neighborhood selection:

Gaslamp Quarter: Historic brick walls (12–18 ft high, excellent readability at pedestrian distance), located directly on the morning-commute spine between residential neighborhoods and downtown office towers. Morning commute 7am–9am feeds directly past the primary surfaces. Evening retail hour stacks on top. A working professional in the biotech or finance sector commuting to downtown hits these walls twice daily on foot.

East Village: Newer construction hoarding (same readability as brick), retail-frontage visibility, mixed residential-commercial. Afternoon and lunch-hour foot traffic (11am–2pm) peaks when biotech workers are walking to lunch or meetings. Secondary commute impact 5pm–7pm (end of business day).

Bankers Hill: Office park commercial property boundaries, morning commute concentration. Less retail foot traffic, more office-worker density. Placements here target the financial services and corporate office workers who form mid-level Palantir customer base.

Little Italy: Secondary zone, art-forward storefronts with creative-worker density. Lower foot traffic than other zones but reaches design-culture earlyadadopters and startup employees.

Honolulu surface selection:

Downtown Honolulu: Office towers, state government buildings, financial institutions. Foot traffic is concentrated (predictable, morning and lunch). Workers walk the same corridors daily. Three walls within two blocks means an office worker hitting the same block five days a week sees the message five times that week.

Ala Moana: Retail corridor, shopping district, office mixed-use development. Lunch-hour and after-work foot traffic. Office workers and retail employees commuting through the corridor during lunch (11am–2pm) and evening (5pm–7pm) hit the placements consistently.

Surface strategy isn’t about “finding premium walls.” It’s about matching surfaces to where the target talent congregation their time. Brick walls, scaffolding, and retail hoardings are all equally readable from street distance. The strategic difference is location: Is this wall on the morning commute spine or the evening retail corridor? Is this wall in the business district (office workers) or the arts district (creative workers)? Frequency depends on overlap with talent movement patterns.

Frequency Over Footprint: The Routing Logic

A pedestrian walking downtown Gaslamp between their office and the transit station might walk the same 3-block corridor 10 times per week (commute, lunch walks, evening post-work walks). Seven to nine walls clustered in a 4-block radius means they see the Palantir message 3–5 times per week. That repetition builds memory. The third encounter feels familiar. The fourth encounter feels intentional (they notice the brand is taking multiple positions in the zone). By the fifth encounter, they remember the call to action.

Compare that to spread-and-reach: same seven to nine walls scattered across a 30-block downtown radius. The same pedestrian sees it once, maybe twice per week. Less frequency. Lower retention. Lower motivation to act on the call to action.

Palantir chose frequency over reach because professional recruiting in concentrated markets (San Diego has maybe 5,000 qualifying engineers) benefits from saturation psychology, not raw audience size.

This is why San Diego got 29 walls across four neighborhoods (high density per zone) rather than 29 walls scattered across seven neighborhoods (lower density per zone). And why Honolulu got 6 walls concentrated in two blocks (maximum frequency in a small market) rather than 6 walls spread across Waikiki and Pearl.

The Install Timeline: 48 Hours vs. 72 Hours

San Diego: 48-hour blitz.

Thursday morning: two parallel crews, one anchoring Gaslamp + Little Italy, one handling East Village + Bankers Hill. Morning start (7am) captures full daylight for surface inspection and prep. Each crew works systematically through their zones. Gaslamp crew finishes by 2pm Thursday; East Village crew finishes by 4pm Thursday. Both crews return Friday 7am for secondary touch-ups and reinforcement paste on high-traffic surfaces. By Friday end-of-business, all 29 surfaces are pasted, cured, and photographed.

Why 48-hour velocity? San Diego is a Tier-1 market with crew embedded in established property-owner relationships. Permits close fast. Surface prep is known. Paste cures quickly in warm, low-humidity May weather. The goal is synchronization: get all surfaces up within a tight window so every neighborhood sees full campaign coverage simultaneously. If word spreads that the campaign is running, the bulk is already live. If a property owner objects, we’re already past that surface.

Honolulu: 72-hour burn.

Friday: property-agreement walkthroughs and surface prep. The Honolulu crew is smaller and has fewer pre-established property owner relationships than the San Diego team, so coordination takes longer. Friday handles pre-install logistics: confirming wall access, checking surface conditions for tropical weathering (salt corrosion, mold, texture variation), and staging materials.

Saturday: full primary paste installation across downtown (9am–4pm) and Ala Moana (5pm–12am). Saturday-evening install on Ala Moana captures the retail-corridor foot traffic during shopping hours, the poster goes up and immediately faces 15K+ pedestrian impressions before close-of-business. Downtown install earlier in the day allows for midday observation and surface touch-ups.

Sunday: reinforcement paste on four highest-traffic surfaces (downtown core, Ala Moana retail frontage). Documentation. GPS logging.

Why 72-hour tempo? Honolulu’s tropical humidity (60–75% RH, 75–80°F) is problematic for standard mainland paste formulation, the adhesive slumps or takes 48+ hours to cure. BSM’s Honolulu crew uses a thicker paste chemistry mixed specifically for tropical conditions. The slower installation pace allows for proper cure observation and reinforcement without paste failure risk. Additionally, three-day window spreads installation logistics across multiple days, reducing crew stress and improving quality control.

Same strategic goal (frequency, saturation, documented proof). Different operational tempo driven by market variables.

Creative Considerations: One Poster, Four Audiences

The poster is large-format typographic: “Every Generation Faces Its Test. This Is Yours.” + palantir.com/join. Black and white. No imagery, no brand logo animation. Pure headline and call to action.

The simplicity is strategic. The message needs to read at 30 feet, in daylight, on various surface textures (brick, hoarding, concrete, painted facade). Complicated imagery gets lost at street distance. The message is abstract enough to land differently to different audiences:

Gaslamp (older, established business district): reads as generational leadership and institutional seriousness. A 45-year-old senior engineer sees civic responsibility. Palantir isn’t selling a job, it’s articulating a mission.

East Village (younger, tech-forward): reads as recruitment and opportunity. A 28-year-old engineer sees a direct call: “This is your generation. This is your moment. Join us.”

Bankers Hill (finance and corporate services): reads as competence and institutional strength. Palantir is staking a claim in the professional class.

Little Italy (arts and creative): reads as a cultural moment and brand presence. The minimalist design signals design sophistication.

Same headline. Four different reads. The strength is that it’s genuine to each audience, not copywritten with four variants, just simple enough to mean different things in different contexts.

Documentation: GPS Proof and Recruitment Attribution

All 35 surfaces documented same-day.

Each wall received: GPS coordinates, timestamp, surface type (brick, hoarding, concrete, painted facade), neighborhood zone, crew member ID, date installed, daylight photography (wide shot for context, close-up for detail).

San Diego installation logs were delivered Monday morning (final close by Friday). Honolulu installation logs completed by Monday end-of-business (final close by Sunday).

Client received location manifest with latitude/longitude for every wall, elevation estimate, and wall-by-wall photo set. This served two purposes:

  1. Geographic validation. Proof that the campaign actually happened in these specific places. GPS coordinates are defensible, no hand-waving about estimated reach or impressions. Actual walls. Actual addresses.

  2. Recruitment attribution. Palantir’s recruiting team used the location manifest to run geographic analysis: LinkedIn profile views from San Diego and Honolulu addresses, application completions from regional IP addresses, and recruiter inquiries mentioning the poster. They could say: “18 inbound applications specifically mentioning the San Diego or Honolulu street campaign” because the manifest was specific enough to correlate.

Recruitment attribution is tricky because most talent acquisition is multi-touch, a person sees the poster, then searches the company, then sees the LinkedIn ad, then applies. Attribution is murky. But the geographic proximity (applications from Honolulu zip codes during and immediately after the campaign) and direct mentions (“saw the poster in downtown Honolulu”) make it reasonable to credit the campaign with influence.

Conservative attribution: 18 recruiter-qualified inbound inquiries from the campaign.

The Recruitment Results: CAC and Yield

Hard metric: 18 LinkedIn recruiter inquiries specifically mentioning “saw the poster.”

Soft metric: 63 application completions to recruitment page from geographic zip codes where campaigns ran during campaign window.

CAC calculation (hard metric): 18 recruiter-qualified leads / $14,800 campaign = $822 per lead

CAC comparison: LinkedIn recruitment advertising for tech talent: $40–80 per click, $800–$2,400 per qualified lead. Palantir’s street campaign achieved comparable or better CAC at the low end of LinkedIn’s range.

Difference in quality: LinkedIn generates clicks from a broad tech demographic. The street campaign generated applications specifically from San Diego and Honolulu talent pools. Palantir’s recruiting team reported higher interview-to-offer conversion from street-originated leads than from LinkedIn-originated leads (not scientifically controlled, but anecdotally meaningful). Street visibility signal (the message felt locally targeted, not national noise) made leads feel more serious.

Lessons for B2B Brands Running Street Campaigns

1. Geographic concentration beats national reach. If you’re recruiting or selling to a specific professional cohort in specific markets, frequency in those markets beats low-frequency across broad reach. Palantir didn’t run 35 walls nationwide. They ran 35 walls in two markets where their target audience clusters.

2. Commute patterns matter more than raw foot traffic. A wall on the morning commute spine (same pedestrian, same time, multiple passes per week) is more valuable than a wall in a shopping district (random pedestrians, low repeat encounter). B2B campaigns should map target audience movement patterns and place accordingly.

3. B2B messaging can be high-level. “Every Generation Faces Its Test” doesn’t say “We’re hiring senior bioinformaticists” or “We need engineers with defense-adjacent experience.” It’s abstracted to a generational mission. That abstraction lets it land credibly across different seniority levels and specializations. B2B street advertising doesn’t need to over-specify; it needs to signal seriousness and target the right geographic zone.

4. Documentation is the proof. For B2B recruiting, proof matters more than impressions. “35 walls in San Diego and Honolulu” with GPS documentation is more convincing than “estimated reach of 2M” based on foot-traffic models. Recruiter teams can use geographic proof to run attribution analysis and measure CAC.

5. Operational tempo matters. 48-hour blitz in a Tier-1 market, 72-hour burn in a smaller market. Don’t force the same tempo everywhere. Calibrate installation speed to market characteristics (crew relationships, weather, humidity, crew size) and strategic goal (density synchronization vs. quality observation).


See our case study on Palantir’s multi-city campaign for the full photographic documentation and final wrap deck. See our guide on wheatpaste advertising for how to run multi-city campaigns. See our B2B recruiting resource for San Diego-specific guerrilla marketing strategy.

The message travels. The geography decides. The frequency converts. This is what multi-city B2B recruitment looks like when the street is the campaign.

03 · The answers

Strategy questions.

Q · 01

Why did Palantir choose San Diego and Honolulu instead of Silicon Valley or Austin?

Silicon Valley is saturated with tech recruiting advertising. LinkedIn, Glassdoor, every tech recruiter in North America is targeting the same zip codes. San Diego has strong bioinformatics, defense contracting, and software engineering talent pipelines (UC San Diego, Torrey Pines biotech corridor) with less competitive recruiting noise. Honolulu has smaller, more concentrated tech talent pool where a highly-visible street campaign stands out. Geographic specificity is the strength: Palantir isn't recruiting nationwide; they're targeting high-value engineering talent in markets where they have real presence (San Diego is a Palantir engineering hub; Honolulu is an emerging market). Street presence in these secondary markets signals employer seriousness.

Q · 02

What's the difference between San Diego and Honolulu execution, and why did they differ?

San Diego: 29 walls, 48 hours, four-neighborhood saturation (Gaslamp, East Village, Bankers Hill, Little Italy). Goal was density and frequency, a pedestrian walking downtown Gaslamp saw the message multiple times in one week. Honolulu: 6 walls, 72 hours, two-location clustering (downtown financial district, Ala Moana retail). Goal was local presence with longer visibility window. San Diego is Tier-1 market with crew embedded in established property owner relationships, permits closed fast, install velocity was high. Honolulu is smaller market with slower property coordination cycles and tropical humidity requiring different paste chemistry. Same creative system, two execution tempos calibrated to market realities and talent distribution.

Q · 03

How did Palantir select specific neighborhoods and surfaces?

Palantir's recruiting team identified where their highest-value talent (senior engineers, bioinformatics specialists, defense-adjacent professionals) congregates during work commute and business hours. San Diego: Gaslamp Quarter is downtown commercial core with law offices, biotech corporate HQs, and tech startups, morning commute draws 7am-9am traffic. East Village is newer mixed-use development with retail and offices, lunch-hour foot traffic peaks 11am-1pm. Bankers Hill is financial and corporate office parks with concentrated morning and afternoon commute windows. Little Italy is secondary creative/design zone with startup density. Honolulu: downtown financial district (state government offices, finance institutions, corporate headquarters, morning and lunch commute) and Ala Moana (retail + office mixed-use where office workers spend lunch and after-work hours). Surface selection followed talent density: high-visibility walls on commute corridors where decision-makers (mid-level to senior engineers) walk daily.

Q · 04

What's 'frequency over footprint' and how did it change the campaign strategy?

Frequency over footprint means concentrating placements in smaller geographic areas to maximize repeat encounters rather than spreading placements across larger areas for raw reach. A pedestrian who sees the Palantir poster 3 times in one week (walking the same downtown Gaslamp corridor three times weekly for work) is more likely to remember and act on it than a pedestrian who sees it once in each of five different neighborhoods. Palantir wanted frequency: seven to nine walls per neighborhood cluster meant a downtown-worker seeing the message multiple times per week. This strategy is stronger for B2B recruiting because professional talent has predictable commute patterns (same route, same hours). For consumer campaigns targeting tourists or diverse pedestrians, spread-and-reach is better. For recruiting in concentrated employment zones, frequency wins.

Q · 05

How does the install velocity differ between 48-hour and 72-hour campaigns, and why does it matter?

48-hour velocity (San Diego): two parallel crews, synchronized neighborhood install, rapid saturation. Goal is to get all surfaces pasted within a tight window so every neighborhood sees full coverage simultaneously. Advantage: if word spreads or a property owner objects, the bulk of the campaign is already live. Disadvantage: intense crew logistics, higher labor cost per wall, compressed installation quality window. 72-hour velocity (Honolulu): sequential neighborhood install with reinforcement passes. Friday property coordination and surface prep, Saturday primary install, Sunday reinforcement on high-traffic surfaces. Goal is to extend the visible quality window and allow for tropical humidity cure time. Advantage: slower pace improves paste adhesion in high-humidity conditions; allows for quality observation and touch-up. Disadvantage: longer window means earlier-installed surfaces start degrading before final surfaces go up (loss of simultaneous saturation). Honolulu chose 72-hour tempo because tropical climate requires longer cure time. San Diego chose 48-hour tempo because the market supports rapid execution and the goal was density impact.

Q · 06

What proof did Palantir get from the campaign, and what did they do with it?

All 35 surfaces documented same-day: GPS coordinates, timestamp, surface type, crew member ID, daylight photography. Palantir received location manifest with latitude/longitude for every wall, elevation estimate, and wall-by-wall photo set. Additionally: install logs running parallel to the campaign logged every surface from the moment paste hit the wall. San Diego closed documentation by Friday; Honolulu by Sunday. Beyond the location proof, Palantir measured outcomes: LinkedIn profile views from San Diego addresses (187 during/after campaign), application completions to recruitment page from GPS-associated zip codes (63 applications), and inbound recruiter inquiries mentioning 'saw the poster' (18 qualified leads). The proof served two purposes: geographic validation (campaign happened in these specific places) and recruitment attribution (how many people encountered the work and followed the call to action).

Q · 07

How did the creative messaging ('Every Generation Faces Its Test') land differently in San Diego vs. Honolulu?

Same message, four different reads based on context. Gaslamp (older, established business district): reads as civic responsibility and generational leadership, appealing to senior professionals and established engineers. East Village (younger, tech-forward): reads as recruitment pitch and opportunity, appealing to junior and mid-level technologists. Downtown Honolulu (government and finance): reads as competence claim and institutional seriousness, appealing to senior talent and established professionals. Ala Moana (retail and mixed-use): reads as brand invitation and growth narrative, appealing to younger talent and career-changers. Same poster, different audience segments interpret it through their neighborhood context. The messaging is strong enough to land as credible to all four segments because it's high-level (not overly junior or overly senior) and it positions recruitment as a mission, not a transaction. That's deliberate creative architecture: broad enough to speak to diverse talent pools, specific enough to land as authentic rather than generic.

Q · 08

What was the recruitment yield from the campaign, and how does that compare to traditional recruiting spend?

Hard attribution: 18 LinkedIn recruiter inquiries specifically mentioning 'saw the poster in San Diego/Honolulu' in application notes or outreach messages. Softer attribution: 63 application completions to recruitment page traceable to geographic zip codes where campaigns ran during campaign window (likely includes people who saw the poster and then searched 'palantir.com/join'). Conservative CAC: 18 confirmed leads / $14,800 campaign cost = $822 per recruiter-qualified lead. LinkedIn recruitment advertising for tech talent typically costs $40–80 per click, or $800–$2,400 per qualified lead. Palantir's street campaign achieved competitive CAC at the low end of LinkedIn's range, but with higher-quality, geographically-concentrated candidates and stronger brand presence signal in markets where they're actively hiring.

Operator log · live
5–7 day turnaround 100% photo proof on every install Refund if we miss the install window

Read the essay?
Send the brief.

Markets, window, creative direction. Quote back in 48 hours with city-mapped install plan.

Start a brief More essays

Print + Install · Documented every hit · BSM Brooklyn HQ